Part 9 - Feb 22 2002
Posted: Fri Dec 21, 2018 2:21 pm
#241 From: "JMA" <mail@...>
Date: Fri Feb 22, 2002 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: Legalese / doubletalk mailjmase
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Invite to Yahoo! 360° Invite to Yahoo! 360°
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:27:37 -0000, drittervonfuenf wrote:
>> One example: did you download the Flash 5 player? Well, one of the most
>> influent members of Innotek has implicitely admitted here the he has the
>> leaked sources.
>
>No one of Innotek ever said so!
>
Only Eirik was dumb enough to admit right out.
Achim more of hinted it.
>What you prob. don't know is that Achim worked for IBM
>and thus did know that sources leaked as IBM does know
>that they leaked.
>
Hmmm.
Its quite possible Innotek has a contract with IBM that allows them to posses
and use IBM sources for some things. Having such a contract and not telling
anyone would be on the verge of anticompetitive though...
If Achim/Innotek has no contract with IBM then Achim is bound to follow
the rules set up in his employee contract with IBM.
I dont know how IBMs contracts are written but the one I had myself with
a large company some years ago cleraly stated that I was never to reviel
"sensitive information" either during or after my employment.
But this is all getting really stupid:
We have a group of people that has the code and dont want to tell anyone.
They are involved in the worst possible doubletalk about whats the worst
crime posession or spreading.
Both are crimes !
Does one or three yeras in prison really matter ?
Sincerely
JMA
Development and Consulting
John Martin , jma@...
==================================
Website: http://www.jma.se/
email: mail@...
Phone: 46-(0)70-6278410
==================================
Date: Fri Feb 22, 2002 8:36 pm
Subject: Re: Legalese / doubletalk mailjmase
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
Invite to Yahoo! 360° Invite to Yahoo! 360°
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 16:27:37 -0000, drittervonfuenf wrote:
>> One example: did you download the Flash 5 player? Well, one of the most
>> influent members of Innotek has implicitely admitted here the he has the
>> leaked sources.
>
>No one of Innotek ever said so!
>
Only Eirik was dumb enough to admit right out.
Achim more of hinted it.
>What you prob. don't know is that Achim worked for IBM
>and thus did know that sources leaked as IBM does know
>that they leaked.
>
Hmmm.
Its quite possible Innotek has a contract with IBM that allows them to posses
and use IBM sources for some things. Having such a contract and not telling
anyone would be on the verge of anticompetitive though...
If Achim/Innotek has no contract with IBM then Achim is bound to follow
the rules set up in his employee contract with IBM.
I dont know how IBMs contracts are written but the one I had myself with
a large company some years ago cleraly stated that I was never to reviel
"sensitive information" either during or after my employment.
But this is all getting really stupid:
We have a group of people that has the code and dont want to tell anyone.
They are involved in the worst possible doubletalk about whats the worst
crime posession or spreading.
Both are crimes !
Does one or three yeras in prison really matter ?
Sincerely
JMA
Development and Consulting
John Martin , jma@...
==================================
Website: http://www.jma.se/
email: mail@...
Phone: 46-(0)70-6278410
==================================