#1236 RE: [osFree] Digest Number 332 Re: Re: Extent of OS/2 Source Code Owned by Microsoft?
Expand Messages
Stephen
Jun 27, 2005
>>Re: Re: Extent of OS/2 Source Code Owned by Microsoft?
>Hi,
>Don't forget the file system that MS owns all or part of. HPFS was
>mostly developed by Microsoft; in fact NTFS is just a slightly modified
>HPFS. LAN Manager is jointly owned also. I have a book about
programming
>for Microsoft LAN Manager that was published by Microsoft Press.
>
>WarpDavey
No, HPFS and NTFS are very different, and nothing is similar between the
two. NTFS is a transaction based FS using clusters to organise sectors.
HPFS, on the other hand, has no transaction or journal capability,
starts writes from the middle of the disk, and does NOT used any cluster
algorithm (organised via physical 512 bytes sectors).
Regards,
S.
-----Original Message-----
From:
osFree@yahoogroups.com [mailto:
osFree@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: 27 June 2005 11:37
To:
osFree@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [osFree] Digest Number 332
There is 1 message in this issue.
Topics in this digest:
1. Re: Re: Extent of OS/2 Source Code Owned by Microsoft?
From: Davey Brain <dsbrain@...>
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 10:36:32 -0400
From: Davey Brain <dsbrain@...>
Subject: Re: Re: Extent of OS/2 Source Code Owned by Microsoft?
Monsieur Bill wrote:
> --- In
osFree@yahoogroups.com, "Daniel Lee Kruse" <warprulz@y...>
> wrote:
>
>>--- In
osFree@yahoogroups.com, Tom Lee Mullins <tomleem@c...>
>
> wrote:
>
>><snip>
>>
>>>"
>>>I asked about how much of the source code for/of OS/2
>>>is still owned by Microsoft.
>>>
>>
>>
>>If memory serves, the Presentation Manager. The Workplace Shell
>
> was
>
>>introduced after their separation - I think. I know SOM (which
>
> the
>
>>WPS is built) is wholly IBM's and open sourced (or am I dreaming
>
> that
>
>>one up?).
>>
>>I suspect some chunks of the multimedia sub-system is, too,
>
> co-owned.
>
>> The Control Programming Interface before their separation.
>
> Chunks
>
>>(or most) of the Graphic Primitives Interface. Since the Kernel
>>Execution Environment wasn't introduced until Warp Server for
>>eBusiness there is no reason why it wouldn't be wholly IBM's.
>>
>>I'm sure there's more stuff, but I'm just too tired to think of
>
> them
>
>>now.
>>
>>Daniel Lee Kruse
>
>
> The netbios part of the network is microsoft owned, TCP/IP is a fork
> from NetBSD.
>
> If you want to see, the owner can be (may be ?) in the header of
> each exe/dll
>
> Mercier JF
Hi,
Don't forget the file system that MS owns all or part of. HPFS was
mostly developed by Microsoft; in fact NTFS is just a slightly modified
HPFS. LAN Manager is jointly owned also. I have a book about programming
for Microsoft LAN Manager that was published by Microsoft Press.
WarpDavey
--
Davey Brain
Due to political oppression I'm seeking a Canadian or European
spouse...any takers?
"It is dangerous to be right when the established authorities are wrong"
- Voltaire
This OS/2 uptime is 10 d 23 h 17 m 09 seconds
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
------------------------------------------------------------------------
==================================================================
The HENLEY College
------------------------------------------------------------------
This message and any files transmitted with it is intended for the
addressee only and may contain information that is confidential
and/or legally privileged.
Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you
are not the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or
otherwise use this message, including any picture or graphic and any
attachment, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee. We
make every effort to keep our network free from viruses. However, you
do need to verify this e-mail and any attachments to it to be virus
free as we can take no responsibility for any computer virus which
might be transferred by way of this e-mail.