Re: [osFree] OS/2 Petition Ready!
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2019 9:47 am
#1220 Re: [osFree] OS/2 Petition Ready!
Expand Messages
Tom Lee Mullins
Apr 28, 2005
Kenn Yuill wrote:
>Tom Lee Mullins wrote as follows on 04/28/05 08:31 AM:
>
>
>
>>>>http://www.os2world.com/petition/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>The petition to get IBM to open
>>>>>>source OS/2 is ready and at the
>>>>>>above link. I have signed it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>BigWarpGuy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Having OS/2 open sourced (even if it
>>>>is only parts of it) would be a boost
>>>>to OSFree.
>>>>
>>>>TomLeeM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>IIRC - there were at least 4,000 that signed
>>the petition. Open sourcing OS/2 - even if it
>>is only parts of it - would give OSFree a big
>>boost (IMHO).
>>
>>TomLeeM
>>
>>
>>
>
>Although it is very probable that I will sign this petition, I have
>problems with its construction and tone, plus the fact that it doesn't
>compel me to participate immediately. The petition starts with a
>negative statement whereas it should refer to the "OS/2 Community" as a
>diverse group of programmers, users and developers with grave concerns
>about the future of this excellent operating system. There should be
>some mention of the number of new and improved programs written for OS/2
>in the last few years along with the number of active programmers and
>developers, if available.
>
>This petition *must* convince an executive at IBM, who may not be
>totally familiar with OS/2, that this OS is worth saving and the best
>policy is its release to open source. If I envision myself as such an
>executive, this petition does not convince me unequivocally that OS/2
>has a real future. In other words, all statements should be positive in
>tone, as the objective is to elicit a definitive yes from this decision
>maker, not a "It's a good thought, but..." or "A nice idea, however...",
>but a resounding "Let's do it!".
>
>
>
I will forward your thoughts and suggestions to the person who created it.
Thank you for your e-mail.
--
TomLeeM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://www.ecomstation.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://tomleem.homestead.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Expand Messages
Tom Lee Mullins
Apr 28, 2005
Kenn Yuill wrote:
>Tom Lee Mullins wrote as follows on 04/28/05 08:31 AM:
>
>
>
>>>>http://www.os2world.com/petition/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>The petition to get IBM to open
>>>>>>source OS/2 is ready and at the
>>>>>>above link. I have signed it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>BigWarpGuy
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Having OS/2 open sourced (even if it
>>>>is only parts of it) would be a boost
>>>>to OSFree.
>>>>
>>>>TomLeeM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>IIRC - there were at least 4,000 that signed
>>the petition. Open sourcing OS/2 - even if it
>>is only parts of it - would give OSFree a big
>>boost (IMHO).
>>
>>TomLeeM
>>
>>
>>
>
>Although it is very probable that I will sign this petition, I have
>problems with its construction and tone, plus the fact that it doesn't
>compel me to participate immediately. The petition starts with a
>negative statement whereas it should refer to the "OS/2 Community" as a
>diverse group of programmers, users and developers with grave concerns
>about the future of this excellent operating system. There should be
>some mention of the number of new and improved programs written for OS/2
>in the last few years along with the number of active programmers and
>developers, if available.
>
>This petition *must* convince an executive at IBM, who may not be
>totally familiar with OS/2, that this OS is worth saving and the best
>policy is its release to open source. If I envision myself as such an
>executive, this petition does not convince me unequivocally that OS/2
>has a real future. In other words, all statements should be positive in
>tone, as the objective is to elicit a definitive yes from this decision
>maker, not a "It's a good thought, but..." or "A nice idea, however...",
>but a resounding "Let's do it!".
>
>
>
I will forward your thoughts and suggestions to the person who created it.
Thank you for your e-mail.
--
TomLeeM
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://www.ecomstation.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
http://tomleem.homestead.com
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *